A Quick Thought on Trump Freezing Aid to Ukraine
Less on policy, more on the personalities at play.
The debate over continued U.S. support for Ukraine remains contentious, with concerns over spending and long-term commitments dominating the conversation. Earlier this evening, President Donald Trump froze all aid to Ukraine in the hopes that the nation would come to the table to negotiate peace. However, the strategic value of maintaining aid should not be overlooked. Every resource Russia expends in Ukraine is one less it can use to destabilize American interests elsewhere.
Despite China's declared "no limits" partnership with Russia, Beijing has not fully replaced Moscow’s losses. As a result, both of the United States’ most significant geopolitical adversaries are being drained of resources and attention—all without the need for American military intervention. This is a strategic advantage that strengthens U.S. national security in the long term.
That said, transparency in foreign aid is essential. Every dollar and every shipment of arms must be accounted for to ensure resources are being used effectively and in alignment with U.S. interests. A clear, well-structured oversight mechanism would reinforce public confidence in these efforts.
In other words, I want foreign aid so transparent that Kanye West could make his partner wear it to the Grammys.
Vice President J.D. Vance appears to have the most influence on the White House’s foreign policy stance. His perspective leans heavily toward isolationism, which, if left unchecked, could weaken the U.S.'s global positioning. Given the current position of the Trump administration, Vance has Trump’s ear more than any other member of the Cabinet.
I think a more balanced voice is needed—one that recognizes the tightrope walk between securing American interests at home and maintaining stability abroad. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has consistently demonstrated a more measured approach to foreign policy, understanding the necessity of both domestic and global security. His voice should be more prominent in shaping the next administration’s approach to international affairs.
Trump hired Rubio, and I wish he’d listen to him more.
The United States does not have the luxury of disengagement. A strong and strategic foreign policy does not mean unnecessary intervention, but it does require active leadership to prevent adversaries from gaining ground. The choice is not between endless wars and total isolation—it is about ensuring that America remains strong by engaging where it matters most.